Chickasaw vs Indonesian Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Indonesian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Indonesians
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Indonesian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,655,405 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Indonesians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.194 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 3.1%.

Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Indonesian |
Minimum | 0.99% | 0.56% |
Maximum | 35.7% | 37.0% |
Range | 34.7% | 36.5% |
Mean | 16.2% | 16.3% |
Median | 15.3% | 14.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 18.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 7.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Indonesians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Barbadian (14.8%, a difference of 0.93%), Immigrants from West Indies (14.8%, a difference of 0.96%), Immigrants from Bahamas (14.8%, a difference of 0.97%), and Bangladeshi (14.8%, a difference of 1.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Indonesians are Immigrants from Cabo Verde (15.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Mexican (15.1%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Belize (15.1%, a difference of 0.28%), Yaqui (15.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and Inupiat (15.1%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 14.8% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 14.8% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 14.8% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 14.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 14.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 14.9% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 15.0% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 15.0% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 15.0% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 15.0% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 15.0% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 15.1% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 15.1% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 15.1% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 15.1% |
Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 15.1% |