Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Ecuador
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Immigrants from Ecuador
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.3%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Immigrants from Ecuador Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,887,290 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 2.6%.

Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Immigrants from Ecuador |
Minimum | 0.99% | 1.4% |
Maximum | 35.7% | 24.4% |
Range | 34.7% | 23.0% |
Mean | 16.2% | 13.6% |
Median | 15.3% | 13.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 16.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Immigrants from Ecuador by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ecuador are Mexican American Indian (14.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Ottawa (14.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from El Salvador (14.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Nicaragua (14.3%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 14.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 14.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 14.3% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 14.3% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 14.4% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 14.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |