Czechoslovakian Poverty
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Select to Compare
Poverty
Czechoslovakian Poverty
11.3%
POVERTY
85.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,495,231 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.103 and weighted average of 11.3%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.096% in poverty level.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Czechoslovakians and poverty level does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Czechoslovakians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level within an area, or if Czechoslovakians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Immigrants from Bulgaria (11.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Egypt (11.3%, a difference of 0.14%), European (11.3%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Moldova (11.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and Mongolian (11.2%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Slovaks | 86.1 /100 | #68 | Excellent 11.2% |
Immigrants from Croatia | 86.0 /100 | #69 | Excellent 11.2% |
Finns | 85.9 /100 | #70 | Excellent 11.2% |
Immigrants from Eastern Europe | 85.6 /100 | #71 | Excellent 11.2% |
Paraguayans | 85.6 /100 | #72 | Excellent 11.2% |
Mongolians | 85.6 /100 | #73 | Excellent 11.2% |
Immigrants from Moldova | 85.5 /100 | #74 | Excellent 11.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 85.4 /100 | #75 | Excellent 11.3% |
Immigrants from Bulgaria | 85.4 /100 | #76 | Excellent 11.3% |
Immigrants from Egypt | 85.3 /100 | #77 | Excellent 11.3% |
Europeans | 85.3 /100 | #78 | Excellent 11.3% |
Swiss | 85.2 /100 | #79 | Excellent 11.3% |
Egyptians | 85.2 /100 | #80 | Excellent 11.3% |
Immigrants from Southern Europe | 85.2 /100 | #81 | Excellent 11.3% |
Chinese | 85.2 /100 | #82 | Excellent 11.3% |
Czechoslovakian Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czechoslovakian Data | Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.071% | 0.24% |
Maximum | 32.2% | 32.7% |
Range | 32.1% | 32.5% |
Mean | 8.0% | 10.5% |
Median | 6.1% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.8% | 13.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.1% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.0% | 6.5% |
Correlation Details
Czechoslovakian Percentile | Sample Size | Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.071% | 312,089,796 | 12.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.26% | 44,763,100 | 10.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 12,408,489 | 9.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 4,175,098 | 8.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 1,558,674 | 9.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.04% | 888,695 | 8.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 448,885 | 11.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.42% | 335,812 | 8.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.60% | 217,320 | 9.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.80% | 159,545 | 8.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.98% | 80,717 | 9.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.16% | 66,201 | 9.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 58,956 | 11.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 28,278 | 13.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 17,362 | 9.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.93% | 39,316 | 9.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.15% | 20,533 | 10.2% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.34% | 19,436 | 9.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.49% | 12,034 | 13.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.64% | 11,078 | 5.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.91% | 11,829 | 11.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.12% | 11,041 | 10.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.22% | 5,232 | 13.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.46% | 9,626 | 16.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.57% | 5,620 | 13.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.79% | 6,144 | 13.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.02% | 3,845 | 13.4% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.27% | 2,183 | 8.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.45% | 495 | 3.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.54% | 469 | 12.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.74% | 2,422 | 21.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 6.00% | 4,169 | 16.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.20% | 2,808 | 18.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.33% | 1,358 | 15.5% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.47% | 232 | 6.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.67% | 345 | 22.9% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.92% | 954 | 6.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.17% | 3,847 | 2.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.32% | 1,038 | 4.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.51% | 2,317 | 3.4% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.69% | 91 | 2.2% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.08% | 99 | 20.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.52% | 3,910 | 3.6% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.72% | 1,777 | 0.73% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.98% | 323 | 9.3% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.79% | 1,655 | 19.2% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.30% | 2,418 | 5.3% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.71% | 1,111 | 4.7% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.95% | 804 | 10.2% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.25% | 1,449 | 3.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.38% | 773 | 15.4% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.05% | 730 | 16.3% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.17% | 419 | 31.0% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.98% | 578 | 13.8% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.90% | 651 | 32.7% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.77% | 647 | 3.9% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.22% | 424 | 0.24% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.06% | 465 | 0.86% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.44% | 141 | 9.2% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.20% | 125 | 7.2% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.12% | 483 | 2.5% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.57% | 272 | 19.1% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.15% | 136 | 1.5% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.15% | 451 | 6.9% |