Czechoslovakian Poverty
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Select to Compare
Poverty
Czechoslovakian Poverty
11.4%
POVERTY
95.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
89th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 368,518,810 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.060 and weighted average of 11.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechoslovakians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.049% in poverty level.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Czechoslovakians and poverty level does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Czechoslovakians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level within an area, or if Czechoslovakians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Belgian (11.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Denmark (11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Jordanian (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Northern European (11.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from England (11.4%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Egyptians | 96.5 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants from Sweden | 96.3 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 11.3% |
English | 96.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 11.3% |
Immigrants from England | 96.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Jordanians | 96.0 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Northern Europeans | 96.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants from Denmark | 95.5 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Finns | 95.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 11.4% |
British | 95.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Romanians | 94.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Paraguayans | 94.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Australians | 94.9 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 11.4% |
Immigrants from South Africa | 94.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 11.5% |
Czechoslovakian Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czechoslovakian Data | Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.078% | 0.33% |
Maximum | 35.5% | 27.8% |
Range | 35.4% | 27.5% |
Mean | 9.2% | 12.1% |
Median | 7.2% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 8.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.8% | 16.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.1% | 8.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.9% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.8% | 6.4% |
Correlation Details
Czechoslovakian Percentile | Sample Size | Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.078% | 329,687,227 | 12.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.34% | 28,353,113 | 9.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 6,517,720 | 9.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 2,020,690 | 9.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.11% | 726,454 | 9.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.36% | 486,009 | 10.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 249,766 | 9.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.87% | 133,401 | 9.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.12% | 50,388 | 9.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 39,472 | 12.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 52,958 | 9.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.90% | 33,832 | 14.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.08% | 22,563 | 7.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.41% | 27,803 | 7.2% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.66% | 22,393 | 8.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.94% | 11,788 | 13.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 14,207 | 13.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.38% | 10,542 | 18.7% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.66% | 3,498 | 12.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.80% | 4,644 | 13.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.16% | 6,916 | 8.7% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.34% | 3,785 | 10.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.63% | 3,750 | 10.2% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.80% | 1,984 | 20.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.14% | 586 | 17.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.43% | 3,577 | 16.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.72% | 5,864 | 3.8% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.79% | 1,722 | 18.6% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.11% | 211 | 22.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.34% | 109 | 20.2% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.69% | 52 | 9.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.82% | 3,786 | 2.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.24% | 340 | 6.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.48% | 2,075 | 18.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.76% | 605 | 5.6% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.35% | 278 | 15.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.74% | 154 | 20.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.78% | 1,544 | 3.7% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.10% | 1,000 | 18.7% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.50% | 1,810 | 0.94% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.90% | 688 | 22.8% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.43% | 1,452 | 12.9% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.86% | 2,108 | 0.33% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.77% | 376 | 13.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.50% | 526 | 14.8% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.66% | 161 | 15.5% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.29% | 588 | 10.2% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.59% | 1,775 | 15.8% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.25% | 59 | 11.9% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.69% | 102 | 20.6% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.56% | 151 | 27.8% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.92% | 591 | 0.68% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.09% | 515 | 0.97% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.28% | 116 | 10.3% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.05% | 122 | 27.0% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.57% | 504 | 7.1% |
[ 32.0% - 32.5% ] 32.42% | 219 | 17.8% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.46% | 141 | 2.1% |