Chickasaw vs Mexican American Indian Poverty
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Mexican American Indian
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Chickasaw
Mexican American Indians
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
272nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.3%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
256th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Mexican American Indian Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,672,043 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009 and weighted average of 14.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,505,642 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098 and weighted average of 14.3%, a difference of 2.6%.

Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Mexican American Indian |
Minimum | 0.99% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 35.7% | 51.0% |
Range | 34.7% | 49.9% |
Mean | 16.2% | 15.9% |
Median | 15.3% | 14.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 11.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.7% | 18.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.4% | 7.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 9.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.4% | 9.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Mexican American Indians by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Shoshone (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.53%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.63%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.77%), and Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.92%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Immigrants from Ecuador (14.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Ottawa (14.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from El Salvador (14.3%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Nicaragua (14.3%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #254 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #255 | Tragic 14.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #256 | Tragic 14.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 14.3% |
Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 14.3% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 14.3% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 14.4% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 14.4% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 14.5% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 14.5% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 14.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 14.5% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 14.6% |
Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 14.6% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 14.7% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 14.7% |
Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 14.7% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 14.8% |