Hopi Poverty
COMPARE
Hopi
Select to Compare
Poverty
Hopi Poverty
20.8%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hopi Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,733,532 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Hopi and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.262 and weighted average of 20.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hopi within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.094% in poverty level.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Hopi and poverty level does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Hopi influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level within an area, or if Hopi simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Hopi by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hopi are Yup'ik (20.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Crow (20.7%, a difference of 0.93%), Immigrants from Yemen (21.5%, a difference of 3.2%), Yuman (20.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and Pima (21.9%, a difference of 4.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 18.4% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 18.4% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 18.9% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 19.4% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 19.8% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.2% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 20.7% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 20.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 20.8% |
Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 21.5% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 21.9% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 21.9% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 23.1% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 23.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 24.4% |
Hopi Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hopi Data | Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.030% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 95.9% | 60.0% |
Range | 95.8% | 58.7% |
Mean | 33.8% | 26.2% |
Median | 11.0% | 23.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.2% | 17.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 84.8% | 40.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 80.6% | 23.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 38.1% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 37.4% | 13.4% |
Correlation Details
Hopi Percentile | Sample Size | Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.030% | 73,932,771 | 14.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 425,102 | 17.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 214,089 | 20.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.57% | 55,648 | 25.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.09% | 21,914 | 25.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.78% | 20,646 | 17.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.01% | 7,317 | 19.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.19% | 1,478 | 1.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.73% | 824 | 11.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.61% | 8,887 | 23.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.86% | 1,347 | 40.9% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.50% | 6,771 | 20.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.22% | 4,842 | 23.6% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.06% | 574 | 32.9% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.64% | 47 | 60.0% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.37% | 211 | 45.5% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.87% | 11,154 | 24.6% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.32% | 3,918 | 24.2% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.99% | 1,914 | 13.9% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.32% | 343 | 23.9% |
[ 56.0% - 56.5% ] 56.12% | 1,504 | 24.0% |
[ 67.0% - 67.5% ] 67.20% | 436 | 12.4% |
[ 84.5% - 85.0% ] 84.79% | 1,966 | 16.9% |
[ 86.0% - 86.5% ] 86.24% | 1,454 | 19.5% |
[ 88.0% - 88.5% ] 88.35% | 1,064 | 40.4% |
[ 89.0% - 89.5% ] 89.14% | 1,372 | 44.2% |
[ 91.5% - 92.0% ] 91.99% | 2,523 | 43.8% |
[ 94.0% - 94.5% ] 94.25% | 887 | 7.9% |
[ 95.5% - 96.0% ] 95.52% | 1,829 | 44.5% |
[ 95.5% - 96.0% ] 95.86% | 700 | 45.1% |