Immigrants from Bahamas Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bahamas
Select to Compare
Married-couple Households
Immigrants from Bahamas Married-couple Households
41.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
301st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bahamas Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,610,461 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.091 and weighted average of 41.7%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bahamas within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.45% in percentage of married-couple family households.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Bahamas and percentage of married-couple family households does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Bahamas influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of married-couple family households within an area, or if Immigrants from Bahamas simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of married-couple family households due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bahamas by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bahamas are Immigrants from Honduras (41.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Subsaharan African (41.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Belize (41.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Ghana (41.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Guyana (41.6%, a difference of 0.29%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Immigrants from Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.0% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.0% |
Immigrants from Sudan | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 41.9% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 41.8% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 41.8% |
Immigrants from Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 41.8% |
Immigrants from Belize | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 41.8% |
Immigrants from Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 41.7% |
Immigrants from Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 41.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 41.6% |
Immigrants from Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 41.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 41.5% |
Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 41.4% |
Immigrants from Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 41.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 41.4% |
Immigrants from Bahamas Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bahamas Data | Married-couple Households Data |
Minimum | 0.012% | 21.9% |
Maximum | 6.8% | 65.9% |
Range | 6.8% | 44.1% |
Mean | 1.6% | 41.0% |
Median | 0.99% | 39.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.44% | 35.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.0% | 45.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 9.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 8.5% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Bahamas Percentile | Sample Size | Married-couple Households |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.012% | 70,189,094 | 38.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.049% | 14,047,261 | 42.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.085% | 6,089,082 | 43.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.12% | 3,294,008 | 45.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.15% | 2,364,129 | 45.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 1,392,000 | 47.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 1,218,098 | 43.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.26% | 1,253,983 | 43.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.29% | 866,851 | 44.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 496,653 | 48.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 705,551 | 40.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.39% | 321,097 | 37.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.42% | 110,873 | 37.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 393,862 | 36.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.49% | 137,512 | 37.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.53% | 197,536 | 38.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 97,288 | 34.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.61% | 123,572 | 33.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.63% | 170,223 | 32.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.66% | 17,476 | 35.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.69% | 92,307 | 34.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 135,423 | 42.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.76% | 65,202 | 41.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 116,586 | 41.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.87% | 47,838 | 64.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.91% | 43,529 | 35.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.99% | 62,232 | 28.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 104,824 | 36.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 159,944 | 39.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 33,966 | 55.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 2,381 | 49.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 47,470 | 43.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.26% | 12,080 | 52.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.31% | 5,174 | 28.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.34% | 45,312 | 34.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.38% | 1,011 | 21.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.47% | 10,208 | 52.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.50% | 14,558 | 30.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.58% | 43,099 | 34.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.66% | 8,244 | 46.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.26% | 2,349 | 36.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.95% | 847 | 65.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.11% | 7,385 | 40.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.64% | 9,677 | 46.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.86% | 18,487 | 37.3% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.14% | 1,714 | 33.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.34% | 8,118 | 42.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.48% | 15,735 | 46.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.89% | 2,190 | 35.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.97% | 2,151 | 34.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.19% | 1,540 | 36.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.90% | 305 | 37.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.84% | 2,426 | 61.4% |