Crow vs Turkish Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Crow
Turkish
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Crow
Turks
41.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
308th/ 347
METRIC RANK
47.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
96.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Crow vs Turkish Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 59,202,817 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Crow and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.186 and weighted average of 41.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,700,088 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013 and weighted average of 47.8%, a difference of 15.7%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Crow | Turkish |
| Minimum | 21.9% | 29.1% |
| Maximum | 80.8% | 77.4% |
| Range | 58.9% | 48.3% |
| Mean | 45.1% | 52.8% |
| Median | 43.5% | 52.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 37.1% | 49.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 53.2% | 57.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.0% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.1% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.9% | 8.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Crow by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Crow are Guyanese (41.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Western Africa (41.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (41.2%, a difference of 0.35%), Sioux (41.5%, a difference of 0.38%), and Haitian (41.2%, a difference of 0.42%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #301 | Tragic 41.7% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #302 | Tragic 41.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #303 | Tragic 41.6% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.0 /100 | #304 | Tragic 41.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 41.5% |
| Guyanese | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 41.4% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 41.4% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 41.4% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 41.2% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 41.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 41.0% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 40.9% |
| Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 40.9% |
| Jamaicans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 40.9% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 40.9% |
Demographics Similar to Turks by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Slavic (47.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Hawaiian (47.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from South Africa (47.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Italy (47.9%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Austria (47.9%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Americans | 96.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 96.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 96.6 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Latvians | 96.5 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 96.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 96.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 96.3 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 47.9% |
| Turks | 96.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Slavs | 96.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Hawaiians | 96.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 96.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 95.5 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Portuguese | 95.5 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Estonians | 94.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 47.7% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 94.4 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 47.7% |