Chickasaw vs Potawatomi Male Disability
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Potawatomi
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Chickasaw
Potawatomi
15.1%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.2%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
327th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Potawatomi Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,685,248 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,764,083 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.106 and weighted average of 14.2%, a difference of 6.4%.
![Chickasaw vs Potawatomi Male Disability](/correlation-charts/metric-comparison/male-disability/chickasaw-vs-potawatomi-male-disability-chart.webp)
Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Potawatomi |
Minimum | 6.7% | 7.0% |
Maximum | 56.8% | 41.9% |
Range | 50.1% | 34.9% |
Mean | 22.9% | 20.2% |
Median | 21.7% | 19.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.4% | 15.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.7% | 23.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 7.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Potawatomi by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Lumbee (15.2%, a difference of 0.74%), Pueblo (15.0%, a difference of 0.80%), Menominee (15.0%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Native/Alaskan (14.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Chippewa (14.3%, a difference of 0.43%), Cajun (14.4%, a difference of 1.0%), Ottawa (14.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and Comanche (14.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 14.0% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 14.1% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 14.1% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 14.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 14.2% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.3% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.4% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.4% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.7% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.8% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.4% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.5% |