Chickasaw vs Ottawa Male Disability
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Ottawa
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Chickasaw
Ottawa
15.1%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.1%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Ottawa Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,685,248 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455 and weighted average of 15.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,955,365 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.220 and weighted average of 14.1%, a difference of 7.5%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Ottawa |
| Minimum | 6.7% | 4.1% |
| Maximum | 56.8% | 33.3% |
| Range | 50.1% | 29.3% |
| Mean | 22.9% | 16.9% |
| Median | 21.7% | 16.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.4% | 13.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.7% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 6.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.2% | 6.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.1% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Ottawa by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Lumbee (15.2%, a difference of 0.74%), Pueblo (15.0%, a difference of 0.80%), Menominee (15.0%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Comanche (14.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Osage (14.0%, a difference of 0.44%), Apache (14.0%, a difference of 0.51%), Native/Alaskan (14.2%, a difference of 0.94%), and Potawatomi (14.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 14.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 14.1% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 14.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.3% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.4% |