Immigrants from Philippines Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Philippines
Select to Compare
Male Disability
Immigrants from Philippines Male Disability
10.9%
DISABILITY | MALES
85.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Philippines Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,154,961 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Philippines and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029 and weighted average of 10.9%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Philippines within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.0097% in percentage of males with a disability.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Philippines and percentage of males with a disability does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Philippines influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of males with a disability within an area, or if Immigrants from Philippines simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of males with a disability due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Philippines by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Philippines are Immigrants from Latvia (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Brazilian (10.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Macedonian (11.0%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Ukraine (10.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Fiji (11.0%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
Immigrants from Ghana | 89.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | 88.4 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.9% |
South American Indians | 88.1 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants from North Macedonia | 88.1 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | 86.9 /100 | #126 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants from Ukraine | 86.8 /100 | #127 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants from Latvia | 85.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 10.9% |
Immigrants from Philippines | 85.4 /100 | #129 | Excellent 10.9% |
Brazilians | 85.4 /100 | #130 | Excellent 10.9% |
Macedonians | 84.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants from Fiji | 84.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 11.0% |
Ugandans | 83.9 /100 | #133 | Excellent 11.0% |
Bhutanese | 83.4 /100 | #134 | Excellent 11.0% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 83.3 /100 | #135 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants from Costa Rica | 82.8 /100 | #136 | Excellent 11.0% |
Immigrants from Philippines Male Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Philippines Data | Male Disability Data |
Minimum | 0.21% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 66.7% | 26.8% |
Range | 66.5% | 25.0% |
Mean | 16.5% | 11.4% |
Median | 14.9% | 10.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.5% | 10.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 23.0% | 12.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.5% | 2.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.1% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.0% | 4.0% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Philippines Percentile | Sample Size | Male Disability |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.21% | 296,699,167 | 12.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 80,959,683 | 11.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 28,771,664 | 10.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72% | 17,179,011 | 10.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 13,509,881 | 10.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 8,735,072 | 10.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.21% | 8,078,140 | 9.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.78% | 3,518,137 | 10.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.24% | 3,122,846 | 10.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.71% | 1,742,619 | 11.3% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.20% | 729,927 | 10.1% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.77% | 1,389,285 | 11.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.20% | 992,525 | 10.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.76% | 774,924 | 10.0% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.28% | 529,914 | 9.6% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.72% | 876,555 | 8.9% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.17% | 739,884 | 10.8% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.66% | 247,894 | 10.5% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.21% | 276,931 | 11.5% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.71% | 10,198 | 13.4% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.22% | 154,825 | 9.0% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.68% | 1,666 | 26.8% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.23% | 98,961 | 10.7% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.66% | 265,513 | 11.9% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.28% | 424,455 | 9.5% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.79% | 117,816 | 9.8% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.15% | 27,278 | 8.8% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.71% | 184,375 | 11.6% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.15% | 152,755 | 12.3% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.73% | 52,271 | 10.9% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.14% | 3,766 | 8.9% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.88% | 52,871 | 11.0% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.13% | 130,885 | 11.4% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.82% | 220 | 11.8% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.35% | 4,506 | 18.1% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.61% | 426 | 20.7% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.21% | 4,898 | 10.0% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.83% | 13,120 | 7.8% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.04% | 1,376 | 10.0% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.86% | 65,125 | 9.1% |
[ 20.0% - 20.5% ] 20.28% | 208,714 | 10.1% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.61% | 6,469 | 12.0% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.94% | 20,127 | 14.1% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.22% | 2,255 | 10.7% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.94% | 7,179 | 11.4% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.15% | 4,820 | 10.2% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.18% | 28,593 | 12.8% |
[ 24.5% - 25.0% ] 24.71% | 52,328 | 11.5% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.49% | 26,509 | 11.2% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.90% | 72,605 | 13.4% |
[ 26.5% - 27.0% ] 26.79% | 922 | 5.1% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.24% | 16,457 | 12.7% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.75% | 7,922 | 13.1% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.98% | 1,461 | 25.6% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.18% | 3,576 | 6.3% |
[ 31.5% - 32.0% ] 31.63% | 98 | 20.0% |
[ 33.5% - 34.0% ] 33.96% | 45,457 | 12.7% |
[ 34.0% - 34.5% ] 34.06% | 4,342 | 5.5% |
[ 47.5% - 48.0% ] 47.52% | 766 | 1.8% |
[ 66.5% - 67.0% ] 66.69% | 2,996 | 10.4% |