South American vs Immigrants from El Salvador Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 344,112,486 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador within South American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.215. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Americans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Immigrants from El Salvador. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South Americans corresponds to a decrease of 12.7 Immigrants from El Salvador.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,114 compared to $38,394, a difference of 14.9%), median male earnings ($54,492 compared to $47,973, a difference of 13.6%), and median earnings ($46,804 compared to $42,413, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,939 compared to $54,599, a difference of 1.2%), householder income over 65 years ($59,854 compared to $58,226, a difference of 2.8%), and median household income ($86,824 compared to $81,213, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (16.1% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 23.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 22.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.3% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 2.2%), single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.5% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (33.6% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.67%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.4%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.4%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 16.0%), and births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.0% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 1.5%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 29.8%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 38.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 22.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.070%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 55.6%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 62.5%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 35.0%), and master's degree (15.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from El Salvador communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 25.1%, a difference of 12.8%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 11.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), male disability (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and female disability (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.59%).