South American vs Immigrants from Cambodia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 201,941,157 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Cambodia within South American communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.247. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in South Americans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Cambodia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 South Americans corresponds to a decrease of 3.5 Immigrants from Cambodia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,114 compared to $40,434, a difference of 9.1%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 7.6%), and median male earnings ($54,492 compared to $51,594, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,698 compared to $38,833, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($53,939 compared to $52,450, a difference of 2.8%), and median earnings ($46,804 compared to $45,090, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (16.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 12.4%), receiving food stamps (12.4% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 11.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.22%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.5% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.88%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 19.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.4%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.6%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 10.0%), and births to unmarried women (31.8% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.0% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.92%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.27 compared to 3.33, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 32.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 19.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.32%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (51.9% compared to 56.2%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 46.5%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 28.7%), and master's degree (15.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between South American and Immigrants from Cambodia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 21.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 13.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 6.9%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.2%).