Immigrants from Honduras vs Mexican American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 234,664,806 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians within Immigrant from Honduras communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.367. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Honduras within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Mexican American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Honduras corresponds to a decrease of 16.7 Mexican American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,328 compared to $85,066, a difference of 10.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,697 compared to $90,811, a difference of 9.8%), and median household income ($71,452 compared to $78,166, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($36,665 compared to $37,407, a difference of 2.0%), median female earnings ($34,647 compared to $35,629, a difference of 2.8%), and median earnings ($40,195 compared to $41,719, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 18.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (22.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 17.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (22.7% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 6.8%), single male poverty (14.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and single mother poverty (34.7% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 8.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 13.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.58%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.91%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.82%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.58%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.1%), married-couple households (41.6% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 10.4%), and births to unmarried women (39.3% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.32%), average family size (3.36 compared to 3.43, a difference of 2.1%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 38.9%), no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 29.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 27.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 5.7%), master's degree (11.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and college, under 1 year (56.5% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Honduras and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 9.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 5.8%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.29%), cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.65%).