Immigrants from Cambodia vs Mexican American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 167,850,591 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians within Immigrant from Cambodia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.660. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Cambodia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.241% in Mexican American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Cambodia corresponds to an increase of 240.7 Mexican American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($38,833 compared to $35,629, a difference of 9.0%), per capita income ($40,434 compared to $37,407, a difference of 8.1%), and median earnings ($45,090 compared to $41,719, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,450 compared to $51,783, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($57,580 compared to $56,089, a difference of 2.7%), and wage/income gap (23.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 13.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 10.8%), and single female poverty (21.2% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.13%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and receiving food stamps (13.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 14.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 78.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.3%), family households with children (28.9% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and average family size (3.33 compared to 3.43, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (44.5% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 0.090%), divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.6%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 13.9%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.1% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 14.7%), bachelor's degree (34.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 13.0%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (95.8% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.010%), 5th grade (95.5% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and 6th grade (95.2% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Cambodia and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 6.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 4.4%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and male disability (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.47%).