Immigrants from Egypt vs Mexican American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 184,939,396 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians within Immigrant from Egypt communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.527. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Egypt within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.050% in Mexican American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Egypt corresponds to a decrease of 49.6 Mexican American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,361 compared to $37,407, a difference of 26.6%), median male earnings ($59,925 compared to $47,990, a difference of 24.9%), and median family income ($111,689 compared to $90,918, a difference of 22.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,239 compared to $51,783, a difference of 4.7%), wage/income gap (26.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,299 compared to $56,089, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 33.6%), family poverty (8.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 30.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 8.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.4% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 11.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 18.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 35.9%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 25.9%), and single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.3% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 2.5%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 4.3%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 39.1%), no vehicles in household (12.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 34.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.8% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 23.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 55.4%), master's degree (17.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 52.8%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 52.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Egypt and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 23.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 7.0%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 8.1%), and female disability (11.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 10.6%).