Immigrants from Denmark vs Mexican American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,468,494 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians within Immigrant from Denmark communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.215. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Denmark within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Mexican American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Denmark corresponds to a decrease of 24.3 Mexican American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,799 compared to $37,407, a difference of 43.8%), median male earnings ($64,625 compared to $47,990, a difference of 34.7%), and median family income ($120,445 compared to $90,918, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,612 compared to $51,783, a difference of 1.6%), wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 15.3%), and median female earnings ($43,646 compared to $35,629, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 43.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 40.9%), and family poverty (8.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 1.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and single father poverty (16.7% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 19.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 15.1%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.1% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 36.5%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 33.7%), and births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.3% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 3.0%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households (62.9% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 31.9%), no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 22.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.6% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 18.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 99.4%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 96.6%), and no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 82.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Denmark and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 21.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 16.5%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.8%).