Immigrants from Syria vs Mexican American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,896,158 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians within Immigrant from Syria communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.353. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Syria within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.119% in Mexican American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Syria corresponds to an increase of 119.5 Mexican American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,218 compared to $37,407, a difference of 20.9%), median male earnings ($56,830 compared to $47,990, a difference of 18.4%), and median family income ($106,118 compared to $90,918, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,494 compared to $51,783, a difference of 0.56%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,303 compared to $56,089, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 20.3%), family poverty (9.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 20.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 2.6%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 10.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.3%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 21.8%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.1% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.5%), family households (65.2% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (28.4% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 32.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.4% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 20.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 0.65%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 50.5%), master's degree (16.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 43.8%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 40.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.92%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Syria and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.7% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 15.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.92%), female disability (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 4.1%).