Immigrants from Morocco vs Central American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 150,693,572 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians within Immigrant from Morocco communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.249. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Morocco within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.097% in Central American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Morocco corresponds to an increase of 97.1 Central American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,430 compared to $37,699, a difference of 23.2%), median family income ($105,964 compared to $88,034, a difference of 20.4%), and median male earnings ($56,958 compared to $47,433, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 6.3%), householder income under 25 years ($54,593 compared to $48,643, a difference of 12.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,647 compared to $53,232, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 53.9%), family poverty (9.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 45.9%), and receiving food stamps (11.9% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 15.4%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 20.8%), and single female poverty (20.2% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 26.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 29.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 29.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.2% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.8% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 28.4%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 22.6%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.2% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 1.0%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.35, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 26.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 16.7%), and no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 0.78%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 37.3%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 36.4%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.59%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.60%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Morocco and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 44.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 23.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 3.8%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 7.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.8%).