Immigrants from Uruguay vs Central American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,180,839 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.009. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Central American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 2.1 Central American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,997 compared to $37,699, a difference of 16.7%), median family income ($98,205 compared to $88,034, a difference of 11.6%), and median male earnings ($52,860 compared to $47,433, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $53,232, a difference of 7.0%), householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $48,643, a difference of 7.5%), and median female earnings ($38,945 compared to $35,930, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 45.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.7% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 45.3%), and family poverty (9.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 39.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 15.7%), single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 18.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 24.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 22.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 0.94%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 14.9%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 12.4%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.64%), married-couple households (44.5% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (63.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.6%), no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 25.6%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 22.3%), and master's degree (15.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.53%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.53%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 36.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 25.9%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 7.2%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 8.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.4% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 8.7%).