Immigrants from Chile vs Central American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,841,157 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Central American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 5.7 Central American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,213 compared to $37,699, a difference of 22.6%), median family income ($105,655 compared to $88,034, a difference of 20.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $86,764, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $48,643, a difference of 7.8%), median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $35,930, a difference of 12.3%), and wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 56.9%), family poverty (8.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 49.7%), and receiving food stamps (11.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 48.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 16.3%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 21.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 31.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 25.2%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 25.0%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 21.5%), and single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.6% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.97%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.98%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.35, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 21.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 1.2%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 45.0%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 37.8%), and master's degree (16.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 34.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.70%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.70%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 45.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 28.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 3.7%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 8.7%).