Argentinean vs Central American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 230,626,180 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.129. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.031% in Central American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to a decrease of 30.8 Central American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,862 compared to $37,699, a difference of 32.3%), median family income ($112,665 compared to $88,034, a difference of 28.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,103 compared to $86,764, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $48,643, a difference of 11.3%), median female earnings ($41,952 compared to $35,930, a difference of 16.8%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 63.2%), family poverty (8.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 59.0%), and receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 57.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 22.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 23.2%), and single mother poverty (27.2% compared to 34.3%, a difference of 26.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 32.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 26.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 72.7%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 30.0%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 29.5%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.32%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.0%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.35, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 19.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 0.49%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 52.5%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 63.2%), doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 49.4%), and master's degree (18.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.81%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Central American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 51.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 38.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 29.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 50.5%, a difference of 9.3%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 9.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 11.9%).