Hawaiian vs Iroquois Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Hawaiian
Iroquois
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Hawaiians
Iroquois
47.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
96.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
103rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
43.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hawaiian vs Iroquois Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 327,384,536 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.097 and weighted average of 47.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,249,804 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.281 and weighted average of 43.7%, a difference of 9.3%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hawaiian | Iroquois |
Minimum | 29.5% | 9.6% |
Maximum | 75.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 45.5% | 90.4% |
Mean | 49.4% | 45.4% |
Median | 49.3% | 46.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 46.0% | 40.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 53.0% | 52.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.0% | 12.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 17.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.7% | 17.0% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Hawaiians by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Hawaiians are Slavic (47.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from South Africa (47.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Turkish (47.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Italy (47.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Austria (47.9%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Immigrants | Egypt | 96.6 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 47.9% |
Latvians | 96.5 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 47.9% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 96.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 47.9% |
Immigrants | Austria | 96.4 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 47.9% |
Immigrants | Italy | 96.3 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 47.9% |
Turks | 96.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 47.8% |
Slavs | 96.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 47.8% |
Hawaiians | 96.0 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 47.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 96.0 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 47.8% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 95.5 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 47.8% |
Portuguese | 95.5 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 47.8% |
Estonians | 94.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 47.7% |
Immigrants | Japan | 94.4 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 47.7% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 94.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 47.7% |
Macedonians | 93.9 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 47.6% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Central American Indian (43.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Blackfeet (43.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Cameroon (43.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Alaskan Athabascan (43.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and Ugandan (43.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Seminole | 0.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 44.0% |
Central Americans | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 43.9% |
Apache | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 43.9% |
Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 43.9% |
Ugandans | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 43.8% |
Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 43.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 43.8% |
Iroquois | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 43.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 43.7% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 43.6% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 43.6% |
Cree | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 43.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 43.5% |
Moroccans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 43.5% |
Ecuadorians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 43.5% |