Sudanese In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Sudanese
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Sudanese In Labor Force | Age 20-64
80.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,143,017 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.281 and weighted average of 80.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sudanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.44% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Sudanese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Sudanese influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 within an area, or if Sudanese simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Sudanese by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (80.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Morocco (80.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Kenyan (80.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Serbia (80.8%, a difference of 0.050%), and Liberian (80.9%, a difference of 0.070%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 81.1% |
Immigrants from Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 81.1% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 81.0% |
Immigrants from Bulgaria | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 81.0% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 81.0% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 80.9% |
Liberians | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 80.9% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 80.8% |
Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 80.8% |
Immigrants from Morocco | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 80.8% |
Kenyans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 80.8% |
Immigrants from Serbia | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 80.8% |
Immigrants from Kenya | 99.9 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 80.7% |
Immigrants from Uganda | 99.9 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 80.7% |
Immigrants from South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 80.7% |
Sudanese In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sudanese Data | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Data |
Minimum | 0.020% | 69.6% |
Maximum | 16.9% | 94.5% |
Range | 16.9% | 24.9% |
Mean | 2.5% | 81.2% |
Median | 1.7% | 81.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.83% | 79.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 83.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.7% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 4.2% |
Correlation Details
Sudanese Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.020% | 68,861,930 | 79.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.075% | 13,846,924 | 80.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 7,063,878 | 79.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 3,642,218 | 80.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 2,485,123 | 81.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.28% | 2,246,522 | 81.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 2,758,954 | 81.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.38% | 902,675 | 81.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 1,073,442 | 82.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.48% | 975,332 | 82.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.53% | 1,002,090 | 79.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.58% | 529,129 | 77.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 829,757 | 82.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 328,164 | 82.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 394,831 | 82.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.78% | 195,444 | 81.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 292,745 | 82.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 230,407 | 81.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 214,821 | 80.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 107,636 | 80.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 205,660 | 82.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 361,784 | 77.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.15% | 88,579 | 85.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 49,109 | 82.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.24% | 84,796 | 86.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.29% | 119,830 | 81.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 266,931 | 83.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.37% | 58,210 | 85.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.43% | 27,816 | 82.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.48% | 62,837 | 84.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.52% | 39,237 | 80.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 6,278 | 78.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.65% | 11,427 | 86.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 35,223 | 84.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.82% | 119,866 | 79.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.84% | 21,801 | 76.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 52,472 | 82.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.94% | 12,595 | 87.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.01% | 29,580 | 80.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.04% | 33,194 | 80.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.12% | 84,292 | 79.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.16% | 43,183 | 80.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 404 | 80.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.31% | 29,261 | 86.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.47% | 51,386 | 82.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 8,283 | 90.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.64% | 13,087 | 85.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 68,762 | 84.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 8,259 | 75.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.93% | 26,293 | 85.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.97% | 21,583 | 82.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.17% | 3,093 | 78.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.22% | 31,976 | 83.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.42% | 1,082 | 78.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.58% | 3,440 | 87.5% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.84% | 1,822 | 94.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.32% | 533 | 69.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53% | 22,340 | 76.3% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.65% | 495 | 72.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 24,028 | 72.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.26% | 2,586 | 73.9% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.27% | 590 | 84.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.47% | 9,917 | 77.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.01% | 10,086 | 78.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.92% | 2,727 | 86.6% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.12% | 1,206 | 75.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.88% | 3,056 | 74.7% |