Sudanese vs Mexican American Indian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Sudanese
Mexican American Indian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Sudanese
Mexican American Indians
22.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
275th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Mexican American Indian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,775,287 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136 and weighted average of 22.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 315,510,714 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.382 and weighted average of 23.4%, a difference of 3.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sudanese | Mexican American Indian |
Minimum | 8.0% | 7.7% |
Maximum | 48.2% | 75.0% |
Range | 40.2% | 67.3% |
Mean | 24.5% | 32.2% |
Median | 22.1% | 29.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.2% | 23.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.9% | 38.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 15.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 12.5% |
Demographics Similar to Sudanese and Mexican American Indians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Belize (22.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.20%), White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.34%), Celtic (22.7%, a difference of 0.41%), and Immigrants from Cabo Verde (22.8%, a difference of 0.68%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mexican American Indians are Alaska Native (23.3%, a difference of 0.27%), Marshallese (23.3%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Senegal (23.2%, a difference of 0.53%), Subsaharan African (23.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and Immigrants from the Azores (23.5%, a difference of 0.78%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |