Sudanese vs Scandinavian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Sudanese
Scandinavian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Sudanese
Scandinavians
22.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
45.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
177th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Scandinavian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,775,287 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.136 and weighted average of 22.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 461,288,786 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.635 and weighted average of 21.1%, a difference of 7.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Sudanese | Scandinavian |
| Minimum | 8.0% | 17.8% |
| Maximum | 48.2% | 100.0% |
| Range | 40.2% | 82.2% |
| Mean | 24.5% | 42.1% |
| Median | 22.1% | 32.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.2% | 22.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.9% | 58.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 36.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 24.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.5% | 24.3% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Sudanese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Belize (22.6%, a difference of 0.14%), Bahamian (22.7%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (22.6%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Sudan (22.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and White/Caucasian (22.7%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 1.2 /100 | #250 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Delaware | 1.0 /100 | #252 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.9 /100 | #253 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.8 /100 | #254 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 0.8 /100 | #255 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.8 /100 | #256 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Sudanese | 0.7 /100 | #257 | Tragic 22.6% |
| Bahamians | 0.6 /100 | #258 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.6 /100 | #259 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Celtics | 0.5 /100 | #260 | Tragic 22.7% |
| Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.4 /100 | #261 | Tragic 22.8% |
| British West Indians | 0.4 /100 | #262 | Tragic 22.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 0.3 /100 | #263 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
Demographics Similar to Scandinavians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are Canadian (21.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Czech (21.0%, a difference of 0.10%), British (21.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and Spanish American Indian (21.1%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
| Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
| Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
| Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
| Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |