Sudanese In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Sudanese
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Sudanese In Labor Force | Age > 16
68.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,150,876 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.202 and weighted average of 68.0%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sudanese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.34% in labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Sudanese and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Sudanese influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over within an area, or if Sudanese simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Sudanese by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Nepal (68.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Bolivian (68.2%, a difference of 0.22%), Liberian (67.8%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (67.7%, a difference of 0.44%), and Immigrants from Sudan (67.7%, a difference of 0.54%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Sierra Leoneans | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 68.9% |
Immigrants from Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 68.9% |
Immigrants from Cameroon | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 68.7% |
Immigrants from Sierra Leone | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 68.5% |
Immigrants from Eastern Africa | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 68.5% |
Immigrants from Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 68.4% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 68.0% |
Immigrants from Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 68.0% |
Liberians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 67.8% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 67.7% |
Immigrants from Sudan | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 67.7% |
Immigrants from India | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 67.6% |
Immigrants from Liberia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 67.6% |
Kenyans | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 67.6% |
Sudanese In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sudanese Data | In Labor Force | Age > 16 Data |
Minimum | 0.020% | 53.6% |
Maximum | 16.9% | 78.4% |
Range | 16.9% | 24.8% |
Mean | 2.5% | 67.8% |
Median | 1.7% | 68.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.83% | 65.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.0% | 70.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.7% | 4.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 4.5% |
Correlation Details
Sudanese Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.020% | 68,861,930 | 66.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.075% | 13,846,924 | 67.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 7,063,878 | 66.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.18% | 3,642,218 | 67.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 2,485,123 | 68.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.28% | 2,246,522 | 68.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.33% | 2,758,954 | 69.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.38% | 902,675 | 68.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.43% | 1,073,442 | 70.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.48% | 975,332 | 68.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.53% | 1,002,090 | 66.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.58% | 529,129 | 63.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.65% | 829,757 | 70.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 328,164 | 69.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.73% | 394,831 | 68.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.78% | 195,444 | 67.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.83% | 292,745 | 69.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 230,407 | 69.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 214,821 | 67.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.98% | 107,636 | 67.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.05% | 205,660 | 70.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.10% | 361,784 | 65.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.15% | 88,579 | 72.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.19% | 49,109 | 65.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.24% | 84,796 | 72.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.29% | 119,830 | 64.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 266,931 | 70.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.37% | 58,210 | 74.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.43% | 27,816 | 76.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.48% | 62,837 | 72.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.52% | 39,237 | 66.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.61% | 6,278 | 68.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.65% | 11,427 | 72.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.68% | 35,223 | 70.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.82% | 119,866 | 68.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.84% | 21,801 | 62.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 52,472 | 69.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.94% | 12,595 | 71.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.01% | 29,580 | 68.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.04% | 33,194 | 71.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.12% | 84,292 | 64.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.16% | 43,183 | 68.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 404 | 53.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.31% | 29,261 | 74.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.47% | 51,386 | 68.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 8,283 | 71.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.64% | 13,087 | 78.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.71% | 68,762 | 71.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.74% | 8,259 | 63.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.93% | 26,293 | 71.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.97% | 21,583 | 66.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.17% | 3,093 | 60.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.22% | 31,976 | 69.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.42% | 1,082 | 60.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.58% | 3,440 | 71.7% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.32% | 533 | 62.9% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.53% | 22,340 | 68.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.65% | 495 | 61.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.10% | 24,028 | 62.5% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.26% | 2,586 | 67.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.45% | 9,681 | 53.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.27% | 590 | 61.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.47% | 9,917 | 61.1% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.01% | 10,086 | 69.3% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.92% | 2,727 | 74.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.12% | 1,206 | 62.6% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.88% | 3,056 | 68.1% |