Samoan vs Immigrants from Uganda Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Samoan
Immigrants from Uganda
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Samoans
Immigrants from Uganda
20.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
76.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
155th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
89.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Samoan vs Immigrants from Uganda Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,791,038 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Samoans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355 and weighted average of 20.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,509,533 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.206 and weighted average of 20.3%, a difference of 1.5%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Samoan | Immigrants from Uganda |
| Minimum | 4.0% | 5.5% |
| Maximum | 62.7% | 66.7% |
| Range | 58.7% | 61.2% |
| Mean | 23.3% | 22.5% |
| Median | 20.1% | 19.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.4% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.3% | 26.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.9% | 11.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.3% | 12.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.2% | 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Samoans and Immigrants from Uganda by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are South American Indian (20.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Europe (20.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Swedish (20.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Uruguay (20.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Oceania (20.7%, a difference of 0.15%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uganda are Immigrants from North America (20.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Australian (20.3%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (20.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Kuwait (20.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and Syrian (20.3%, a difference of 0.23%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 89.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 89.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Australians | 88.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 88.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 20.3% |
| Austrians | 85.8 /100 | #145 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Venezuelans | 85.5 /100 | #146 | Excellent 20.4% |
| South Africans | 85.3 /100 | #147 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Luxembourgers | 84.9 /100 | #148 | Excellent 20.4% |
| Portuguese | 81.5 /100 | #149 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 80.5 /100 | #150 | Excellent 20.5% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 79.6 /100 | #151 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 77.7 /100 | #152 | Good 20.6% |
| Swedes | 77.1 /100 | #153 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 76.7 /100 | #154 | Good 20.6% |
| Samoans | 76.0 /100 | #155 | Good 20.6% |
| South American Indians | 75.7 /100 | #156 | Good 20.6% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 74.3 /100 | #157 | Good 20.7% |
| Danes | 73.0 /100 | #158 | Good 20.7% |