Immigrants from Scotland Single Mother Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Scotland
Select to Compare
Single Mother Poverty
Immigrants from Scotland Single Mother Poverty
27.5%
POVERTY | SINGLE MOTHERS
85.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
70th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Scotland Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 196,244,944 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Scotland and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477 and weighted average of 27.5%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Scotland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 11.6% in poverty level among single mothers.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Scotland and poverty level among single mothers does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Scotland influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single mothers within an area, or if Immigrants from Scotland simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single mothers due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Scotland by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Scotland are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (27.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Latvian (27.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Cypriot (27.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Belarus (27.4%, a difference of 0.11%), and Jordanian (27.4%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
Immigrants from Eastern Europe | 85.5 /100 | #63 | Excellent 27.4% |
Immigrants from Bulgaria | 85.5 /100 | #64 | Excellent 27.4% |
Afghans | 85.4 /100 | #65 | Excellent 27.4% |
Immigrants from Argentina | 85.4 /100 | #66 | Excellent 27.4% |
Jordanians | 85.3 /100 | #67 | Excellent 27.4% |
Immigrants from Belarus | 85.3 /100 | #68 | Excellent 27.4% |
Cypriots | 85.3 /100 | #69 | Excellent 27.4% |
Immigrants from Scotland | 85.2 /100 | #70 | Excellent 27.5% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | 85.2 /100 | #71 | Excellent 27.5% |
Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #72 | Excellent 27.5% |
Immigrants from Russia | 85.0 /100 | #73 | Excellent 27.5% |
Greeks | 84.9 /100 | #74 | Excellent 27.5% |
Immigrants from Australia | 84.8 /100 | #75 | Excellent 27.5% |
Immigrants from Vietnam | 84.8 /100 | #76 | Excellent 27.6% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | 84.8 /100 | #77 | Excellent 27.6% |
Immigrants from Scotland Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Scotland Data | Single Mother Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.017% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 4.9% | 100.0% |
Range | 4.9% | 98.9% |
Mean | 1.1% | 40.1% |
Median | 0.91% | 32.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.46% | 25.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.6% | 52.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.2% | 27.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.93% | 22.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.92% | 22.6% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Scotland Percentile | Sample Size | Single Mother Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.017% | 124,344,103 | 30.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.049% | 36,543,107 | 25.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.083% | 15,421,387 | 25.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.12% | 7,786,142 | 25.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.15% | 4,048,639 | 25.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 2,071,343 | 28.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.22% | 1,828,147 | 25.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 946,199 | 26.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.29% | 822,462 | 24.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.32% | 488,721 | 24.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 331,676 | 28.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.40% | 247,321 | 23.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.42% | 375,605 | 31.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 175,307 | 27.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.50% | 261,816 | 24.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 118,246 | 31.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.56% | 112,100 | 34.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.59% | 24,282 | 20.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.63% | 11,682 | 40.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.67% | 17,066 | 57.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 20,181 | 35.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.72% | 61,767 | 25.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.76% | 16,068 | 37.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 2,137 | 60.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.84% | 6,514 | 78.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.88% | 15,399 | 80.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 225 | 85.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 13,869 | 72.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.97% | 4,310 | 30.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 1.00% | 6,023 | 1.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.03% | 9,908 | 19.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 2,226 | 29.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.14% | 6,330 | 38.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 26,835 | 26.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.21% | 165 | 66.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.32% | 20,240 | 14.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.34% | 1,935 | 12.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 2,126 | 21.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.45% | 550 | 37.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.54% | 2,270 | 35.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.64% | 1,528 | 40.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.64% | 1,280 | 73.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.71% | 18,399 | 14.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.75% | 10,772 | 38.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 1,450 | 100.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.86% | 2,040 | 40.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.96% | 255 | 50.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.01% | 3,191 | 33.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.20% | 726 | 55.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.36% | 2,204 | 85.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.65% | 4,190 | 62.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.81% | 1,708 | 33.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.55% | 2,283 | 52.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.91% | 489 | 100.0% |