Immigrants from Romania vs Ute Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Romania
Ute
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Romania
Ute
18.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Romania vs Ute Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,376,234 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.591 and weighted average of 18.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,519,789 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325 and weighted average of 28.4%, a difference of 50.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Romania | Ute |
Minimum | 5.2% | 18.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 94.8% | 82.0% |
Mean | 21.4% | 43.7% |
Median | 18.3% | 37.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.5% | 27.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.2% | 43.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.7% | 16.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.7% | 23.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.5% | 22.9% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Romania by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are Jordanian (18.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Croatia (18.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Serbia (18.8%, a difference of 0.23%), Okinawan (18.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and Bulgarian (18.8%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Demographics Similar to Ute by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Yakama (28.3%, a difference of 0.42%), Native/Alaskan (28.2%, a difference of 0.68%), Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 0.73%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 1.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |