Immigrants from Romania vs Tongan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Romania
Tongan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Romania
Tongans
18.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Romania vs Tongan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 254,376,234 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Romania and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.591 and weighted average of 18.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,377,778 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098 and weighted average of 18.8%, a difference of 0.31%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Romania | Tongan |
| Minimum | 5.2% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 45.5% |
| Range | 94.8% | 41.5% |
| Mean | 21.4% | 19.1% |
| Median | 18.3% | 18.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.5% | 14.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.2% | 22.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.7% | 8.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.7% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.5% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Romania and Tongans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Romania are Jordanian (18.8%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Croatia (18.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Serbia (18.8%, a difference of 0.23%), Okinawan (18.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and Bulgarian (18.8%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Bulgarian (18.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Okinawan (18.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Serbia (18.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Jordanian (18.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Croatia (18.9%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
| Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
| Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |