Immigrants from Czechoslovakia In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia In Labor Force | Age > 16
64.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
12.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,457,762 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.496 and weighted average of 64.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 2.4% in labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over within an area, or if Immigrants from Czechoslovakia simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Estonian (64.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Belgian (64.7%, a difference of 0.020%), U.S. Virgin Islander (64.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Alaskan Athabascan (64.8%, a difference of 0.040%), and Maltese (64.8%, a difference of 0.040%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Belizeans | 16.2 /100 | #208 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | 15.6 /100 | #209 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants from Denmark | 14.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 64.8% |
Fijians | 14.1 /100 | #211 | Poor 64.8% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 13.9 /100 | #212 | Poor 64.8% |
Maltese | 13.8 /100 | #213 | Poor 64.8% |
Estonians | 13.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 64.8% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | 12.3 /100 | #215 | Poor 64.8% |
Belgians | 11.4 /100 | #216 | Poor 64.7% |
U.S. Virgin Islanders | 11.3 /100 | #217 | Poor 64.7% |
Alsatians | 10.7 /100 | #218 | Poor 64.7% |
Immigrants from Central America | 10.5 /100 | #219 | Poor 64.7% |
Alaska Natives | 9.9 /100 | #220 | Tragic 64.7% |
Immigrants from Micronesia | 9.6 /100 | #221 | Tragic 64.7% |
Hawaiians | 9.3 /100 | #222 | Tragic 64.7% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Data | In Labor Force | Age > 16 Data |
Minimum | 0.022% | 14.5% |
Maximum | 18.1% | 88.1% |
Range | 18.1% | 73.6% |
Mean | 2.8% | 56.2% |
Median | 1.9% | 61.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.90% | 50.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.4% | 64.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 14.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.0% | 14.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.0% | 14.6% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.022% | 130,946,311 | 66.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.073% | 39,419,897 | 65.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 11,221,197 | 64.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 5,209,777 | 64.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 3,101,532 | 64.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.30% | 1,517,285 | 64.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 1,263,015 | 61.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.41% | 613,737 | 64.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 438,835 | 59.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 377,704 | 64.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 280,430 | 63.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.62% | 287,974 | 65.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 96,067 | 65.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 127,463 | 64.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 73,297 | 61.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 13,000 | 61.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.90% | 128,232 | 67.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95% | 41,413 | 65.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.01% | 39,657 | 65.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 32,075 | 66.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 19,747 | 63.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 29,269 | 70.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 21,542 | 61.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.30% | 31,003 | 62.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 8,415 | 54.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 19,723 | 66.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.45% | 3,104 | 61.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.50% | 10,027 | 57.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.55% | 902 | 60.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.62% | 27,614 | 64.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 5,413 | 54.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 782 | 74.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 1,689 | 63.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.94% | 5,064 | 63.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 2.00% | 2,854 | 45.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.03% | 2,704 | 40.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.11% | 2,460 | 57.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.18% | 1,975 | 42.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 721 | 33.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 1,317 | 62.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.32% | 691 | 21.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.38% | 210 | 52.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 2,436 | 58.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.50% | 1,763 | 50.6% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 4,135 | 63.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.65% | 1,246 | 49.8% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 1,686 | 55.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 3,664 | 66.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.12% | 642 | 37.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.17% | 6,019 | 60.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 417 | 57.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 1,272 | 72.4% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.62% | 995 | 88.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 115 | 45.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.39% | 296 | 14.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.48% | 223 | 26.6% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.58% | 1,289 | 60.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.35% | 355 | 35.9% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.58% | 197 | 71.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.84% | 2,002 | 31.2% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.42% | 1,636 | 65.8% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.11% | 225 | 24.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.14% | 86 | 60.5% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.43% | 83 | 59.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.54% | 346 | 48.8% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.96% | 146 | 15.1% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.13% | 364 | 30.1% |