Immigrants from Czechoslovakia In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia In Labor Force | Age 30-34
85.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,412,342 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 85.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.25% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 within an area, or if Immigrants from Czechoslovakia simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Iranian (85.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Japan (85.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from China (85.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Indian (Asian) (85.4%, a difference of 0.010%), and Maltese (85.4%, a difference of 0.010%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Immigrants from Eastern Europe | 99.3 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 85.4% |
| Immigrants from Iran | 99.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 85.4% |
| Brazilians | 99.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 85.4% |
| Immigrants from Japan | 99.1 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 85.4% |
| Immigrants from China | 99.0 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 85.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 99.0 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 85.4% |
| Maltese | 99.0 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 85.4% |
| Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | 99.0 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 85.4% |
| Iranians | 99.0 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 85.4% |
| Immigrants from Eastern Asia | 98.9 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 85.4% |
| Immigrants from Singapore | 98.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 85.3% |
| Immigrants from Switzerland | 98.7 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 85.3% |
| Immigrants from Russia | 98.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 85.3% |
| Slovaks | 98.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 85.3% |
| Immigrants from Africa | 98.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 85.3% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Data | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Data |
| Minimum | 0.022% | 51.3% |
| Maximum | 18.1% | 100.0% |
| Range | 18.1% | 48.7% |
| Mean | 2.4% | 85.9% |
| Median | 1.6% | 85.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.80% | 82.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 92.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 10.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 10.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.8% | 10.0% |
Correlation Details
| Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.022% | 130,946,311 | 85.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.073% | 39,414,296 | 85.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 11,221,197 | 84.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 5,209,777 | 85.6% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 3,101,532 | 84.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.30% | 1,512,597 | 85.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 1,259,098 | 86.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.41% | 607,586 | 85.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 438,835 | 84.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 375,939 | 87.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 276,746 | 84.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.62% | 287,147 | 88.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 96,067 | 87.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 125,539 | 86.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 73,297 | 84.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 12,655 | 87.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.90% | 128,232 | 84.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.96% | 38,734 | 83.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.01% | 39,657 | 84.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 30,098 | 84.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 19,747 | 79.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 29,183 | 94.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 21,542 | 82.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.30% | 31,003 | 85.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 8,415 | 85.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 19,223 | 86.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.45% | 3,104 | 100.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.50% | 8,753 | 88.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.55% | 902 | 76.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.62% | 27,614 | 94.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 782 | 100.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.88% | 690 | 55.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.94% | 5,064 | 82.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 2.00% | 2,854 | 85.8% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.03% | 2,704 | 100.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.11% | 2,460 | 80.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.18% | 1,975 | 84.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 721 | 100.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 1,317 | 100.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.38% | 210 | 100.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 2,436 | 73.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.50% | 1,763 | 74.2% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 4,135 | 94.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 1,686 | 70.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 3,664 | 87.8% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.12% | 642 | 92.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.17% | 6,019 | 77.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 1,272 | 79.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.62% | 995 | 100.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 115 | 100.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.58% | 1,289 | 83.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.35% | 355 | 51.3% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.58% | 197 | 100.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.84% | 2,002 | 73.1% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.42% | 1,636 | 100.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.14% | 86 | 77.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.43% | 83 | 77.8% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.13% | 364 | 100.0% |