Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Select to Compare
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
14.2%
POVERTY | GIRLS < 16
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
47th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,771,534 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.371 and weighted average of 14.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 3.4% in poverty level among girls under the age of 16.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 within an area, or if Immigrants from Czechoslovakia simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among girls under the age of 16 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Czech (14.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Croatian (14.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Greece (14.1%, a difference of 0.060%), Greek (14.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Israel (14.2%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants from Sri Lanka | 99.5 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants from Bolivia | 99.5 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Immigrants from Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 14.0% |
Koreans | 99.4 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants from Asia | 99.4 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants from Greece | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Croatians | 99.3 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 14.1% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | 99.3 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Greeks | 99.2 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants from Israel | 99.2 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Immigrants from Pakistan | 99.1 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 14.2% |
Italians | 99.1 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Luxembourgers | 99.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Estonians | 98.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 14.3% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Data | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Data |
Minimum | 0.022% | 0.88% |
Maximum | 6.4% | 52.8% |
Range | 6.4% | 51.9% |
Mean | 1.5% | 18.9% |
Median | 1.2% | 14.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.57% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.9% | 22.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.4% | 12.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 12.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 12.2% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Percentile | Sample Size | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.022% | 130,535,266 | 17.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.073% | 38,813,600 | 13.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 10,812,320 | 12.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 4,925,838 | 12.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 2,838,861 | 12.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.30% | 1,391,636 | 11.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 1,133,843 | 10.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.41% | 540,669 | 9.1% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 362,077 | 15.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 331,962 | 9.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 233,751 | 12.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.62% | 253,501 | 10.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 79,336 | 13.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 117,384 | 16.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 68,705 | 10.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 9,071 | 19.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 105,403 | 12.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.96% | 25,270 | 8.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.01% | 37,195 | 18.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 29,352 | 7.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.14% | 14,006 | 7.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 26,533 | 9.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 12,200 | 19.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.30% | 24,230 | 22.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 8,614 | 29.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.45% | 3,104 | 19.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.50% | 7,209 | 13.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.56% | 321 | 46.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.60% | 313 | 46.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72% | 1,341 | 30.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 782 | 40.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.92% | 2,500 | 16.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 2.00% | 2,854 | 43.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.18% | 1,975 | 14.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.29% | 874 | 6.7% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 2,436 | 27.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 4,135 | 27.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 1,426 | 36.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 2,208 | 9.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.18% | 5,795 | 19.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.84% | 2,002 | 0.88% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.42% | 1,636 | 52.8% |