Immigrants from Czechoslovakia In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia In Labor Force | Age 35-44
84.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
95.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
100th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,439,739 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.300 and weighted average of 84.8%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.2% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44.

It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 within an area, or if Immigrants from Czechoslovakia simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Haitian (84.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Indian (Asian) (84.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Australia (84.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (84.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Belarus (84.8%, a difference of 0.020%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
Immigrants from Northern Africa | 97.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Mongolians | 96.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Immigrants from Kuwait | 96.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Cubans | 96.6 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Egyptians | 96.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Indians (Asian) | 96.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Haitians | 96.0 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | 95.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Immigrants from Australia | 95.5 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Immigrants from Southern Europe | 95.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Immigrants from Belarus | 95.3 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Immigrants from Sweden | 95.2 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 84.8% |
South Americans | 95.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Immigrants from Bahamas | 94.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Immigrants from Romania | 94.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 84.8% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Data | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Data |
Minimum | 0.022% | 57.1% |
Maximum | 11.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 10.9% | 42.9% |
Mean | 2.4% | 84.5% |
Median | 1.7% | 84.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.83% | 78.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.7% | 90.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 11.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 9.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 9.7% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.022% | 130,946,311 | 84.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.073% | 39,414,296 | 84.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 11,221,197 | 85.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 5,209,777 | 84.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 3,101,532 | 84.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.30% | 1,517,285 | 86.9% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 1,263,015 | 85.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.41% | 613,737 | 86.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 436,660 | 84.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 375,939 | 85.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 276,746 | 84.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.62% | 287,974 | 85.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 96,067 | 86.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 127,463 | 82.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 73,297 | 81.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 13,000 | 83.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.90% | 128,232 | 87.3% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.95% | 41,413 | 87.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.01% | 39,657 | 84.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.08% | 30,382 | 79.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.13% | 19,747 | 77.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 29,269 | 85.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 21,542 | 80.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.30% | 31,003 | 75.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 8,415 | 77.9% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.40% | 19,723 | 91.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.45% | 3,104 | 89.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.50% | 9,493 | 85.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.55% | 902 | 82.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.62% | 27,614 | 84.2% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.74% | 5,413 | 87.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.79% | 782 | 78.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 1,689 | 72.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.94% | 5,064 | 76.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 2.00% | 2,854 | 67.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.03% | 2,704 | 82.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.11% | 2,460 | 67.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.18% | 1,975 | 57.1% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.22% | 721 | 100.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.28% | 1,317 | 91.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.38% | 210 | 100.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.46% | 2,436 | 99.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.50% | 1,763 | 100.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 4,135 | 91.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.65% | 1,246 | 70.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 1,686 | 63.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 3,664 | 85.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.17% | 6,019 | 90.4% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.36% | 417 | 71.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.46% | 1,272 | 77.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.62% | 995 | 70.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.35% | 115 | 100.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.58% | 1,289 | 74.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.58% | 197 | 100.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.84% | 2,002 | 96.6% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.42% | 1,636 | 95.7% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.11% | 225 | 78.6% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.14% | 86 | 100.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.43% | 83 | 100.0% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.54% | 346 | 84.2% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.96% | 146 | 100.0% |