Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Single Mother Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Select to Compare
Single Mother Poverty
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Single Mother Poverty
27.4%
POVERTY | SINGLE MOTHERS
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 191,942,297 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.554 and weighted average of 27.4%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 5.3% in poverty level among single mothers.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and poverty level among single mothers does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia influences an upward or downward trend in the level of poverty level among single mothers within an area, or if Immigrants from Czechoslovakia simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of poverty level among single mothers due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Czechoslovakia are Immigrants from Australia (27.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Soviet Union (27.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Turkey (27.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Lithuanian (27.4%, a difference of 0.16%), and Russian (27.3%, a difference of 0.17%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
Immigrants from Eastern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 27.2% |
Immigrants from Malaysia | 99.5 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 27.3% |
Immigrants from Northern Europe | 99.5 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 27.3% |
Russians | 99.5 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 27.3% |
Immigrants from Turkey | 99.5 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 27.3% |
Soviet Union | 99.5 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 27.3% |
Immigrants from Australia | 99.5 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 27.3% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia | 99.5 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 27.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.4 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 27.4% |
Immigrants from Belarus | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 27.4% |
Macedonians | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 27.4% |
Immigrants from Russia | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 27.4% |
Sierra Leoneans | 99.3 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 27.4% |
Immigrants from Europe | 99.3 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 27.4% |
Immigrants from Sweden | 99.2 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 27.5% |
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Data | Single Mother Poverty Data |
Minimum | 0.022% | 5.4% |
Maximum | 9.5% | 100.0% |
Range | 9.5% | 94.6% |
Mean | 1.5% | 32.1% |
Median | 1.1% | 29.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 0.54% | 23.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 1.8% | 37.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.3% | 13.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 16.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 16.0% |
Correlation Details
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Percentile | Sample Size | Single Mother Poverty |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.022% | 130,254,986 | 29.7% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.073% | 38,497,624 | 26.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 10,736,936 | 26.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.19% | 4,950,923 | 25.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.25% | 2,770,330 | 24.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.30% | 1,368,611 | 25.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 1,073,817 | 26.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.41% | 501,547 | 23.8% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.46% | 386,221 | 32.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.52% | 336,807 | 27.5% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.57% | 235,919 | 32.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.62% | 257,642 | 27.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.68% | 79,492 | 35.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.75% | 119,488 | 31.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.80% | 66,268 | 18.0% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.85% | 9,071 | 53.6% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.89% | 105,403 | 18.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.96% | 34,790 | 17.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.01% | 17,498 | 31.6% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.09% | 8,254 | 37.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.14% | 14,006 | 13.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.17% | 15,612 | 23.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.23% | 14,895 | 37.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.30% | 24,230 | 50.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.33% | 5,787 | 30.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.41% | 11,743 | 23.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.49% | 2,144 | 37.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.56% | 321 | 50.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.62% | 22,992 | 5.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.72% | 1,341 | 28.6% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.92% | 2,500 | 30.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.02% | 1,336 | 44.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.29% | 874 | 40.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.50% | 1,763 | 50.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.54% | 4,135 | 14.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.73% | 1,426 | 58.5% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.76% | 2,208 | 15.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.17% | 1,009 | 45.5% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.84% | 2,002 | 15.4% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.54% | 346 | 100.0% |