Hawaiian vs Norwegian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Hawaiian
Norwegian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Hawaiians
Norwegians
21.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
37.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
186th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
63.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
166th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hawaiian vs Norwegian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 324,430,861 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.367 and weighted average of 21.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 516,441,916 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.317 and weighted average of 20.8%, a difference of 1.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hawaiian | Norwegian |
| Minimum | 4.5% | 3.6% |
| Maximum | 45.0% | 50.0% |
| Range | 40.5% | 46.4% |
| Mean | 23.0% | 24.8% |
| Median | 20.9% | 23.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.7% | 19.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.3% | 29.1% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.5% | 10.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.3% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 8.7% |
Demographics Similar to Hawaiians and Norwegians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Hawaiians are Immigrants from Cambodia (21.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Hungarian (21.1%, a difference of 0.13%), Slovak (21.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Slavic (21.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and European (21.1%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from Norway (20.8%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (20.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (20.9%, a difference of 0.44%), New Zealander (21.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and Moroccan (21.0%, a difference of 0.66%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Norwegians | 63.0 /100 | #166 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 63.0 /100 | #167 | Good 20.8% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 61.5 /100 | #168 | Good 20.9% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
| Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
| Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
| Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
| Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
| Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |