Hawaiian Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Hawaiian
Select to Compare
Births to Unmarried Women
Hawaiian Births to Unmarried Women
33.2%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
11.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
208th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hawaiian Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 312,224,673 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.164 and weighted average of 33.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.24% in percentage of births to unmarried women.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Hawaiians and percentage of births to unmarried women does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Hawaiians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of births to unmarried women within an area, or if Hawaiians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of births to unmarried women due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Hawaiians by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Hawaiians are Immigrants from Sudan (33.2%, a difference of 0.030%), White/Caucasian (33.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Scotch-Irish (33.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Ecuadorian (33.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Celtic (33.3%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
| Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar | 16.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 32.9% |
| Immigrants from Micronesia | 16.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 32.9% |
| Ute | 14.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 33.0% |
| Immigrants from Africa | 14.3 /100 | #204 | Poor 33.0% |
| German Russians | 13.1 /100 | #205 | Poor 33.1% |
| Uruguayans | 12.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 33.1% |
| Immigrants from Sudan | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 33.2% |
| Hawaiians | 11.3 /100 | #208 | Poor 33.2% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 10.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 33.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 10.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 33.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 10.5 /100 | #211 | Poor 33.3% |
| Celtics | 10.2 /100 | #212 | Poor 33.3% |
| Immigrants from Costa Rica | 9.5 /100 | #213 | Tragic 33.4% |
| Slovaks | 9.3 /100 | #214 | Tragic 33.4% |
| French | 8.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 33.4% |
Hawaiian Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Hawaiian Data | Births to Unmarried Women Data |
| Minimum | 0.12% | 8.9% |
| Maximum | 71.7% | 100.0% |
| Range | 71.6% | 91.1% |
| Mean | 20.3% | 42.0% |
| Median | 16.3% | 31.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.6% | 29.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.5% | 52.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.8% | 23.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.0% | 23.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.9% | 23.4% |
Correlation Details
| Hawaiian Percentile | Sample Size | Births to Unmarried Women |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.12% | 266,730,662 | 33.7% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 26,400,301 | 31.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 7,615,154 | 31.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 4,364,775 | 30.5% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 1,197,758 | 28.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.78% | 1,202,835 | 29.1% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.22% | 811,379 | 30.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.72% | 479,011 | 31.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.20% | 462,732 | 30.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.73% | 343,347 | 28.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.27% | 186,100 | 40.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.89% | 62,612 | 34.7% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.12% | 95,166 | 29.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.78% | 143,115 | 29.9% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.31% | 325,084 | 32.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.64% | 115,990 | 30.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.23% | 89,154 | 26.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.53% | 375,851 | 31.8% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.34% | 126,730 | 29.7% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.78% | 115,253 | 21.7% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.28% | 86,716 | 45.6% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.78% | 179,075 | 32.2% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.15% | 16,192 | 46.3% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.84% | 73,038 | 55.5% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.07% | 65,389 | 59.8% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.65% | 40,405 | 31.9% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.23% | 94,644 | 13.6% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.52% | 9,077 | 55.8% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.14% | 124,786 | 42.6% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.63% | 70,200 | 41.6% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.86% | 12,349 | 8.9% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.65% | 5,485 | 100.0% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.14% | 210 | 80.0% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.62% | 7,198 | 69.8% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.00% | 2,489 | 16.9% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.70% | 7,238 | 92.7% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.39% | 2,211 | 16.9% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.52% | 3,221 | 82.4% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.19% | 6,626 | 61.1% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.66% | 11,029 | 86.3% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.91% | 4,555 | 14.6% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.04% | 1,278 | 30.8% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.52% | 3,593 | 22.6% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.01% | 1,666 | 100.0% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.59% | 6,436 | 59.1% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.74% | 5,774 | 31.8% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.47% | 2,872 | 18.4% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.76% | 2,971 | 72.6% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.25% | 5,891 | 33.3% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.69% | 10,307 | 27.1% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.33% | 465 | 100.0% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.24% | 4,827 | 12.9% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.53% | 3,553 | 8.9% |
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.37% | 10,042 | 52.6% |
[ 42.5% - 43.0% ] 42.64% | 12,114 | 40.0% |
[ 44.5% - 45.0% ] 44.73% | 65,116 | 43.4% |
[ 45.5% - 46.0% ] 45.93% | 3,412 | 45.6% |
[ 47.5% - 48.0% ] 47.99% | 398 | 90.9% |
[ 50.0% - 50.5% ] 50.47% | 2,853 | 40.8% |
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.69% | 2,157 | 29.4% |
[ 54.5% - 55.0% ] 54.63% | 12,370 | 47.6% |
[ 71.5% - 72.0% ] 71.73% | 1,436 | 29.4% |