Hawaiian Currently Married
COMPARE
Hawaiian
Select to Compare
Currently Married
Hawaiian Currently Married
46.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
48.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
176th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Hawaiian Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 327,570,403 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Hawaiians and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.141 and weighted average of 46.6%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.043% in percentage of population currently married.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Hawaiians and percentage of population currently married does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Hawaiians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of percentage of population currently married within an area, or if Hawaiians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of percentage of population currently married due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Hawaiians by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Hawaiians are Israeli (46.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Chickasaw (46.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Peruvian (46.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Brazil (46.6%, a difference of 0.050%), and Tlingit-Haida (46.7%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Armenians | 58.2 /100 | #169 | Average 46.8% |
Immigrants from Latvia | 56.7 /100 | #170 | Average 46.7% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe | 52.4 /100 | #171 | Average 46.7% |
Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants from Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants from Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
Hawaiian Currently Married Correlation Summary
Measurement | Hawaiian Data | Currently Married Data |
Minimum | 0.13% | 32.2% |
Maximum | 71.7% | 58.0% |
Range | 71.6% | 25.8% |
Mean | 21.7% | 46.9% |
Median | 18.7% | 47.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.9% | 43.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.0% | 49.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.1% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.9% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.8% | 4.9% |
Correlation Details
Hawaiian Percentile | Sample Size | Currently Married |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.13% | 279,031,960 | 44.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.71% | 27,966,827 | 47.0% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.22% | 8,188,417 | 47.1% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.73% | 4,634,626 | 46.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.23% | 1,398,061 | 48.7% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.78% | 1,261,041 | 49.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.22% | 887,215 | 47.6% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.73% | 536,018 | 48.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.20% | 490,686 | 48.5% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.73% | 352,959 | 46.9% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.27% | 215,602 | 48.7% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.85% | 72,931 | 42.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.13% | 113,178 | 49.7% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.78% | 161,917 | 50.5% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.31% | 339,648 | 49.0% |
[ 7.5% - 8.0% ] 7.65% | 124,958 | 47.8% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.24% | 93,802 | 49.0% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.53% | 377,701 | 44.9% |
[ 9.0% - 9.5% ] 9.33% | 136,552 | 46.8% |
[ 9.5% - 10.0% ] 9.77% | 130,838 | 47.4% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.29% | 91,303 | 47.5% |
[ 10.5% - 11.0% ] 10.78% | 181,068 | 47.2% |
[ 11.0% - 11.5% ] 11.16% | 17,109 | 47.1% |
[ 11.5% - 12.0% ] 11.83% | 78,234 | 47.1% |
[ 12.0% - 12.5% ] 12.07% | 66,527 | 47.2% |
[ 12.5% - 13.0% ] 12.64% | 41,868 | 47.5% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.23% | 95,035 | 53.8% |
[ 13.5% - 14.0% ] 13.73% | 25,587 | 55.5% |
[ 14.0% - 14.5% ] 14.14% | 124,786 | 47.8% |
[ 14.5% - 15.0% ] 14.64% | 71,032 | 50.7% |
[ 15.0% - 15.5% ] 15.15% | 3,656 | 53.3% |
[ 15.5% - 16.0% ] 15.77% | 17,642 | 48.6% |
[ 16.0% - 16.5% ] 16.21% | 7,809 | 53.0% |
[ 16.5% - 17.0% ] 16.63% | 6,868 | 44.0% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.34% | 1,528 | 38.3% |
[ 17.5% - 18.0% ] 17.69% | 1,984 | 53.4% |
[ 18.5% - 19.0% ] 18.66% | 9,185 | 41.3% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.00% | 2,489 | 50.4% |
[ 19.5% - 20.0% ] 19.70% | 7,974 | 46.0% |
[ 20.5% - 21.0% ] 20.51% | 156 | 47.4% |
[ 21.0% - 21.5% ] 21.39% | 2,211 | 46.8% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.52% | 3,221 | 47.9% |
[ 22.0% - 22.5% ] 22.19% | 6,626 | 40.7% |
[ 22.5% - 23.0% ] 22.66% | 11,406 | 43.9% |
[ 23.0% - 23.5% ] 23.27% | 2,742 | 55.4% |
[ 23.5% - 24.0% ] 23.91% | 4,555 | 47.2% |
[ 24.0% - 24.5% ] 24.41% | 254 | 41.7% |
[ 25.0% - 25.5% ] 25.04% | 1,278 | 49.6% |
[ 25.5% - 26.0% ] 25.61% | 5,267 | 46.8% |
[ 27.0% - 27.5% ] 27.03% | 1,798 | 40.2% |
[ 27.5% - 28.0% ] 27.65% | 8,710 | 45.7% |
[ 28.5% - 29.0% ] 28.59% | 1,462 | 43.5% |
[ 29.5% - 30.0% ] 29.77% | 6,694 | 43.5% |
[ 30.0% - 30.5% ] 30.47% | 2,872 | 56.5% |
[ 30.5% - 31.0% ] 30.76% | 2,971 | 32.2% |
[ 31.0% - 31.5% ] 31.25% | 5,891 | 42.8% |
[ 32.5% - 33.0% ] 32.69% | 10,307 | 41.5% |
[ 33.0% - 33.5% ] 33.33% | 465 | 52.1% |
[ 35.0% - 35.5% ] 35.24% | 4,827 | 45.5% |
[ 36.5% - 37.0% ] 36.58% | 4,284 | 43.2% |
[ 39.0% - 39.5% ] 39.37% | 10,042 | 32.3% |
[ 39.5% - 40.0% ] 39.87% | 4,475 | 43.3% |
[ 42.5% - 43.0% ] 42.64% | 12,114 | 51.2% |
[ 44.0% - 44.5% ] 44.46% | 902 | 37.9% |
[ 44.5% - 45.0% ] 44.73% | 65,116 | 46.1% |
[ 45.5% - 46.0% ] 45.93% | 3,412 | 49.3% |
[ 47.5% - 48.0% ] 47.99% | 398 | 58.0% |
[ 48.0% - 48.5% ] 48.46% | 130 | 36.7% |
[ 49.5% - 50.0% ] 49.74% | 380 | 53.4% |
[ 50.0% - 50.5% ] 50.47% | 2,853 | 45.5% |
[ 53.5% - 54.0% ] 53.69% | 2,157 | 49.0% |
[ 54.5% - 55.0% ] 54.63% | 12,370 | 43.0% |
[ 71.5% - 72.0% ] 71.73% | 1,436 | 50.8% |