Egyptian vs Sioux Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Egyptian
Sioux
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Egyptians
Sioux
19.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
31.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Egyptian vs Sioux Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 273,693,794 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.582 and weighted average of 19.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 232,047,098 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.514 and weighted average of 31.3%, a difference of 64.0%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Egyptian | Sioux |
| Minimum | 11.6% | 7.1% |
| Maximum | 52.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 40.4% | 92.9% |
| Mean | 20.8% | 49.1% |
| Median | 18.5% | 43.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.0% | 29.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.5% | 64.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 35.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 24.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 24.7% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Egyptians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Immigrants from Italy (19.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (19.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Argentina (19.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and Tsimshian (19.1%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Demographics Similar to Sioux by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Navajo (31.7%, a difference of 1.3%), Cajun (30.6%, a difference of 2.0%), Cheyenne (30.4%, a difference of 2.8%), Pima (30.3%, a difference of 3.0%), and Crow (32.4%, a difference of 3.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 32.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 33.0% |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 33.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 34.1% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 34.2% |