Egyptian In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Egyptian
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Egyptian In Labor Force | Age 30-34
85.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Egyptian In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,796,346 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.267 and weighted average of 85.1%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Egyptians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.75% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Egyptians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Egyptians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 within an area, or if Egyptians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Egyptians by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Immigrants from South Central Asia (85.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Scotland (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Hungary (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Romania (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and Yugoslavian (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
| Argentineans | 95.8 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants from South Africa | 95.3 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants from Scotland | 94.9 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants from Hungary | 94.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants from Romania | 94.7 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Yugoslavians | 94.7 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants from South Central Asia | 94.6 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Egyptians | 94.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants from Denmark | 94.3 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants from Malaysia | 94.2 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Asians | 93.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants from Southern Europe | 93.3 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants from Egypt | 93.2 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants from Kuwait | 92.6 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Armenians | 92.2 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Egyptian In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Egyptian Data | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Data |
| Minimum | 0.048% | 20.0% |
| Maximum | 21.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 21.8% | 80.0% |
| Mean | 4.6% | 85.5% |
| Median | 3.3% | 85.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 84.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.8% | 91.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 12.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 12.7% |
Correlation Details
| Egyptian Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.048% | 148,536,164 | 84.5% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.16% | 57,331,851 | 85.4% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 20,117,907 | 85.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 22,777,367 | 85.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.49% | 7,455,069 | 85.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 4,832,451 | 84.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 3,225,676 | 85.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 2,416,103 | 84.9% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 1,797,091 | 85.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.04% | 1,983,146 | 85.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.14% | 858,963 | 83.1% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 675,272 | 85.8% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 775,907 | 85.3% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.48% | 391,296 | 85.8% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.59% | 415,781 | 86.0% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.69% | 513,256 | 84.5% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.80% | 290,694 | 86.7% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 742,845 | 87.2% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.04% | 262,183 | 84.6% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.16% | 122,258 | 80.9% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.27% | 28,023 | 81.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 77,570 | 84.9% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 9,255 | 79.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 159,607 | 84.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.66% | 145,756 | 85.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.79% | 96,434 | 87.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.90% | 3,547 | 92.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.03% | 77,913 | 87.5% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 113,600 | 80.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.25% | 9,596 | 78.7% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.38% | 5,444 | 86.7% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.53% | 18,673 | 89.8% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70% | 81 | 100.0% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 57,821 | 84.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.02% | 4,552 | 95.1% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 60,303 | 88.8% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.22% | 13,070 | 82.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.32% | 533 | 100.0% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.44% | 36,823 | 87.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.52% | 155 | 100.0% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.67% | 52,230 | 85.8% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.79% | 4,782 | 81.8% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13% | 99,800 | 84.6% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.49% | 601 | 100.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.61% | 659 | 100.0% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.99% | 3,553 | 71.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.10% | 6,952 | 100.0% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36% | 14,518 | 93.5% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.59% | 8,410 | 99.2% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.17% | 7,017 | 100.0% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.20% | 140,994 | 82.5% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.83% | 1,155 | 58.3% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.89% | 1,429 | 44.7% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.97% | 747 | 93.1% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.02% | 5,751 | 77.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.44% | 5,000 | 100.0% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.49% | 1,394 | 92.7% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.26% | 241 | 100.0% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.16% | 981 | 88.8% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.88% | 96 | 20.0% |