Egyptian vs Choctaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Egyptian
Choctaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Egyptians
Choctaw
19.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Egyptian vs Choctaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 273,693,794 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.582 and weighted average of 19.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,534,581 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421 and weighted average of 27.2%, a difference of 42.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Egyptian | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 11.6% | 12.6% |
| Maximum | 52.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 40.4% | 87.4% |
| Mean | 20.8% | 41.2% |
| Median | 18.5% | 38.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.0% | 31.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.5% | 46.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 15.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Egyptians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Immigrants from Italy (19.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (19.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Argentina (19.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and Tsimshian (19.1%, a difference of 0.21%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 19.2% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Creek (27.4%, a difference of 0.88%), Dutch West Indian (27.5%, a difference of 0.96%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |