Egyptian In Labor Force | Age 20-64
COMPARE
Egyptian
Select to Compare
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Egyptian In Labor Force | Age 20-64
80.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-64
97.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
76th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Egyptian In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 276,929,100 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.054 and weighted average of 80.2%. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Egyptians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.063% in labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64.
It is essential to understand that the correlation between the percentage of Egyptians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 does not imply a direct cause-and-effect relationship. It remains uncertain whether the presence of Egyptians influences an upward or downward trend in the level of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 within an area, or if Egyptians simply ended up residing in those areas with higher or lower levels of labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 64 due to other factors.
Demographics Similar to Egyptians by In Labor Force | Age 20-64
In terms of in labor force | age 20-64, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Immigrants from Colombia (80.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Romania (80.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (80.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Asian (80.2%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Croatia (80.1%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
| Albanians | 98.6 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 80.2% |
| Immigrants from Turkey | 98.5 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 80.2% |
| Soviet Union | 98.5 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 80.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 98.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 80.2% |
| Cypriots | 98.2 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 80.2% |
| Immigrants from Eastern Europe | 98.1 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 80.2% |
| Immigrants from Afghanistan | 97.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 80.2% |
| Egyptians | 97.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 80.2% |
| Immigrants from Colombia | 97.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 80.2% |
| Immigrants from Romania | 97.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 80.2% |
| Asians | 97.7 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 80.2% |
| Immigrants from Croatia | 97.6 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 80.1% |
| German Russians | 97.3 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 80.1% |
| Immigrants from Japan | 97.3 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 80.1% |
| Colombians | 97.3 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 80.1% |
Egyptian In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Egyptian Data | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 Data |
| Minimum | 0.048% | 65.8% |
| Maximum | 21.9% | 100.0% |
| Range | 21.8% | 34.2% |
| Mean | 4.8% | 81.1% |
| Median | 3.4% | 80.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.6% | 78.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.0% | 83.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.4% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.8% | 5.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.8% | 5.5% |
Correlation Details
| Egyptian Percentile | Sample Size | In Labor Force | Age 20-64 |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.048% | 148,580,883 | 79.3% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.16% | 57,362,155 | 80.0% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.27% | 20,144,272 | 80.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.36% | 22,790,414 | 79.2% |
[ 0.0% - 0.5% ] 0.49% | 7,459,288 | 79.8% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.60% | 4,835,354 | 80.4% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.70% | 3,226,488 | 81.2% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.82% | 2,417,282 | 81.1% |
[ 0.5% - 1.0% ] 0.93% | 1,797,091 | 81.4% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.04% | 1,983,146 | 80.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.14% | 860,367 | 80.5% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.25% | 676,576 | 82.2% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.35% | 775,907 | 79.7% |
[ 1.0% - 1.5% ] 1.48% | 391,296 | 81.4% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.59% | 418,600 | 81.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.69% | 513,256 | 80.3% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.80% | 291,026 | 81.9% |
[ 1.5% - 2.0% ] 1.89% | 742,845 | 81.3% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.04% | 262,183 | 82.4% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.16% | 122,258 | 77.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.27% | 28,023 | 82.0% |
[ 2.0% - 2.5% ] 2.37% | 77,570 | 84.1% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.51% | 9,255 | 86.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.58% | 159,607 | 78.0% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.66% | 145,756 | 82.3% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.79% | 97,376 | 81.4% |
[ 2.5% - 3.0% ] 2.90% | 3,965 | 80.6% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.03% | 77,913 | 80.3% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.10% | 113,952 | 80.9% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.25% | 9,596 | 84.0% |
[ 3.0% - 3.5% ] 3.38% | 5,444 | 81.3% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.53% | 18,673 | 81.9% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.70% | 81 | 89.1% |
[ 3.5% - 4.0% ] 3.83% | 58,053 | 76.4% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.01% | 5,835 | 87.2% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.09% | 60,303 | 83.5% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.22% | 13,070 | 79.9% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.32% | 533 | 69.6% |
[ 4.0% - 4.5% ] 4.44% | 36,823 | 84.1% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.52% | 155 | 92.4% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.67% | 52,230 | 77.2% |
[ 4.5% - 5.0% ] 4.79% | 4,782 | 78.1% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.13% | 99,800 | 84.0% |
[ 5.0% - 5.5% ] 5.49% | 601 | 69.8% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.61% | 659 | 77.6% |
[ 5.5% - 6.0% ] 5.99% | 3,553 | 77.3% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.10% | 6,952 | 89.4% |
[ 6.0% - 6.5% ] 6.36% | 14,518 | 79.6% |
[ 6.5% - 7.0% ] 6.59% | 8,410 | 88.4% |
[ 7.0% - 7.5% ] 7.17% | 7,017 | 88.4% |
[ 8.0% - 8.5% ] 8.20% | 140,994 | 77.9% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.83% | 1,155 | 77.2% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.89% | 1,429 | 71.1% |
[ 8.5% - 9.0% ] 8.97% | 747 | 89.6% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.02% | 5,751 | 83.8% |
[ 10.0% - 10.5% ] 10.44% | 5,000 | 89.2% |
[ 13.0% - 13.5% ] 13.49% | 1,394 | 65.8% |
[ 17.0% - 17.5% ] 17.50% | 120 | 77.1% |
[ 18.0% - 18.5% ] 18.26% | 241 | 100.0% |
[ 19.0% - 19.5% ] 19.16% | 981 | 73.5% |
[ 21.5% - 22.0% ] 21.88% | 96 | 74.4% |