Egyptian vs Immigrants from Argentina Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Egyptian
Immigrants from Argentina
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Egyptians
Immigrants from Argentina
19.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
48th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Egyptian vs Immigrants from Argentina Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 273,693,794 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Egyptians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.582 and weighted average of 19.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 261,466,881 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Argentina and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.227 and weighted average of 19.0%, a difference of 0.13%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Egyptian | Immigrants from Argentina |
| Minimum | 11.6% | 6.3% |
| Maximum | 52.0% | 55.7% |
| Range | 40.4% | 49.4% |
| Mean | 20.8% | 19.7% |
| Median | 18.5% | 18.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.0% | 15.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.5% | 22.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.6% | 6.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.1% | 8.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 8.8% |
Demographics Similar to Egyptians and Immigrants from Argentina by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Egyptians are Immigrants from Italy (19.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (19.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Tsimshian (19.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and Argentinean (19.1%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Argentina are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (19.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Italy (19.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Latvian (19.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and Tsimshian (19.1%, a difference of 0.34%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
| Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Egyptians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Tsimshian | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Argentineans | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.6 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 19.2% |
| Russians | 99.6 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 19.2% |