Romanian vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Romanian
Chippewa
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Romanians
Chippewa
19.6%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
98.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
94th/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Romanian vs Chippewa Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 371,309,640 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Romanians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.155 and weighted average of 19.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,087,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 26.8%, a difference of 36.7%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Romanian | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 11.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 87.6% |
| Range | 97.5% | 75.7% |
| Mean | 28.0% | 38.7% |
| Median | 19.5% | 35.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.6% | 26.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 30.1% | 47.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.5% | 21.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 24.2% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.7% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Romanians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Romanians are Immigrants from Austria (19.6%, a difference of 0.22%), Italian (19.6%, a difference of 0.23%), Soviet Union (19.6%, a difference of 0.28%), Immigrants from Lebanon (19.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and Estonian (19.7%, a difference of 0.38%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Zimbabweans | 99.0 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Afghans | 99.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 19.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Soviet Union | 98.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Italians | 98.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Romanians | 98.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 19.6% |
| Estonians | 98.2 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 98.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Croatians | 98.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Immigrants | France | 97.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 97.9 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 19.7% |
| Ukrainians | 97.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 19.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.41%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.84%), Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 25.8% |
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |