Pima vs Korean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,145,963 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Koreans within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.254. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.110% in Koreans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 109.9 Koreans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Korean communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $110,334, a difference of 50.4%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $95,018, a difference of 50.2%), and per capita income ($30,644 compared to $44,522, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $57,730, a difference of 12.1%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $41,276, a difference of 16.8%), and wage/income gap (21.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Korean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 148.0%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 135.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (29.7% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 113.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 5.7%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 46.2%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 63.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Korean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 146.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 130.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 118.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Korean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 6.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Korean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 74.9%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 71.0%), and married-couple households (35.6% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 3.5%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.36, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Korean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 76.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 61.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 6.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 24.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Korean communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 37.0%, a difference of 59.6%), associate's degree (30.2% compared to 45.8%, a difference of 51.4%), and master's degree (9.2% compared to 14.0%, a difference of 51.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 94.3%, a difference of 0.35%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.58%), and 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.0%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Korean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 66.8%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 60.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.5%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 11.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 11.7%).