Pima vs Immigrants from Jamaica Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 51,652,008 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jamaica within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.188. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Immigrants from Jamaica. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 12.9 Immigrants from Jamaica.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $38,766, a difference of 26.5%), median household income ($63,262 compared to $75,851, a difference of 19.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $87,035, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $83,298, a difference of 0.58%), householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $51,038, a difference of 0.91%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $54,027, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 83.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 71.8%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 64.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 12.4%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 16.5%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 30.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 110.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 97.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 81.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (14.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 9.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 13.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 72.4%, a difference of 4.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 32.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 78.5%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 32.7%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (8.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.96%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 78.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 50.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.53%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.66%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 41.7%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 41.0%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.020%), 8th grade (95.6% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.69%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Jamaica communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 62.3%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 41.8%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 38.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 1.1%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 6.9%).