Pima vs Sudanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 38,478,216 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.896. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.217% in Sudanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 216.6 Sudanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $41,695, a difference of 36.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $93,718, a difference of 27.7%), and median family income ($77,431 compared to $96,783, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $84,401, a difference of 1.9%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $38,215, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $46,982, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 102.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 102.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (19.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 84.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 7.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 23.4%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 28.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 184.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 154.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 121.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 9.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 42.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 25.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 68.0%, a difference of 18.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.8%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (74.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 13.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 13.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 72.6%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 58.9%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 43.7%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.99%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and family households (65.9% compared to 60.0%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 43.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 39.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 53.6%, a difference of 3.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 23.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 67.6%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 65.4%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 58.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.030%), 7th grade (96.1% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.23%), and 6th grade (97.2% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Sudanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 63.2%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 59.1%), and ambulatory disability (8.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 7.0%).