Pima vs Immigrants from Canada Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,170,762 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.331. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.029% in Immigrants from Canada. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 29.1 Immigrants from Canada.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $49,412, a difference of 61.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $109,402, a difference of 49.1%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $92,029, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $53,411, a difference of 3.7%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $41,373, a difference of 17.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $102,616, a difference of 23.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 156.6%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 134.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 112.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 11.9%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 35.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.4% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 45.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 162.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 125.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 106.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 23.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 14.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 14.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 10.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 92.9%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 30.4%, a difference of 69.1%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 48.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 2.1%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 61.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 5.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 86.0%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 41.7%, a difference of 79.8%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 71.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%), 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Canada communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 75.0%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 53.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 7.1%), male disability (12.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 8.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.8%).