Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Yugoslavian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,943,057 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.389. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Yugoslavians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 23.8 Yugoslavians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $91,368, a difference of 40.3%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $82,186, a difference of 35.7%), and per capita income ($56,709 compared to $42,792, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 26.7%, a difference of 4.6%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $51,028, a difference of 21.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $58,243, a difference of 22.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 38.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (12.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 31.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 31.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 10.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 33.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 18.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 37.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.83%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.37%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 30.8%), single father households (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 28.2%), and single mother households (4.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.15, a difference of 3.5%), and currently married (48.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 25.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 7.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.1%, a difference of 2.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 60.2%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 56.0%), and no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 46.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.9% compared to 86.7%, a difference of 0.29%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.3% compared to 92.1%, a difference of 0.84%), and nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Yugoslavian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 50.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 43.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.71%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.9%), and cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 7.1%).