Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Iranian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 213,342,024 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Iranians within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.362. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.097% in Iranians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 96.8 Iranians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 16.4%), householder income under 25 years ($62,083 compared to $55,548, a difference of 11.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $77,429, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($70,146 compared to $70,648, a difference of 0.72%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($127,500 compared to $129,350, a difference of 1.5%), and median household income ($111,519 compared to $109,835, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 14.9%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 14.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 0.66%), child poverty under the age of 16 (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.76%), and single father poverty (14.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.6%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.67%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.88%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 33.0%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 72.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 0.85%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.47%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 8.4%), births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 7.3%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.9% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.59%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.62%), and married-couple households (49.6% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 32.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 58.1%, a difference of 10.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.28%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 49.4%), professional degree (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.9%), and doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.89%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.90%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Iranian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.6%), disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (19.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.41%), female disability (10.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 0.65%), and disability (10.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.82%).